USPTO serial 78002590
EMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Cragle
DAVID R CRAGLEP O BOX 2685BELLAIRE, TX 77402-2685UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment, including computer hardware and associated electronics, computer software, cabling, motorized carriage/transport apparatus, and electromagnetic acoustic transducers used or usable in the testing of metal goods (plate, vessels, and tubing) to determine material thickness and to detect flaws through surface and volumetric inspections by means of ultrasonic waves induced in the metal goods via electromagnetic acoustic transduction techniques as described in American Society for Testing and Materials E 1816-96, "Standard Practice for Using Electormagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Inspection services utilizing equipment, including computer hardware and associated electronics, computer software, cabling, motorized carriage/transport apparatus, and electromagnetic acoustic transducers used or usable in the testing of metal goods (plate, vessels, and tubing) to determine material thickness and to detect flaws through surface and volumetric inspections by means of ultrasonic waves induced in the metal goods via electromagnetic acoustic transduction techniques as described in American Society for Testing and Materials E 1816-96, "Standard Practice for Using Electormagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT) Techniques" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |