USPTO serial 78002810
JAMAZON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAMAZON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | resource directory services and information location services for electronic communications networks, advertising services, business consulting, promoting the sale or distribution of goods or services of others, and licensing of computer software and of entertainment products and services | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |