USPTO serial 78004925
X-PIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X-PIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Internal combustion engine exhausts | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 4, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 4, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |