USPTO serial 78004931
DUNGEON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUNGEON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Boney Denison
MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER, PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Articles of clothing, namely, bandannas, garter belts, money belts, clothing belts, boxer shorts, briefs, coats, rain coats, overcoats, jackets, leather jackets and coats, rainwear, costumes and masks sold in connection therewith, gloves, golf shirts, polo shirts, knit shirts, sweat shirts and undershirts, head bands, pants, sweaters, sweat bands and sun visors; footwear; and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |