USPTO serial 78004988
STICKY FINGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STICKY FINGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby wipes; Disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene; and Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |