Drawing for CYTURA

USPTO serial 78005021

CYTURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYTURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. BREWSTER

WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING AND MANAGING E-BUSINESSES, INCLUDING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONTENT SUBMISSION AND MANAGEMENT, NAMELY THE CREATION, ENTRY, REVIEW, EDITING, PUBLICATION, AND DISTRIBUTION OF WEB SITE CONTENT, AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF WEBSITE CONTENT BASED ON USERS' PROFILESACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TRAINING AND SEMINARS IN THE USE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING AND MANAGING E-BUSINESSES, INCLUDING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONTENT SUBMISSION AND MANAGEMENT, NAMELY THE CREATION, ENTRY, REVIEW, EDITING, PUBLICATION, AND DISTRIBUTION OF WEB SITE CONTENT, AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF WEBSITE CONTENT BASED ON USERS' PROFILESACTIVE—
042CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTING WITH OTHERS REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CREATING AND MANAGING E-BUSINESSES, INCLUDING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONTENT SUBMISSION AND MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, THE CREATION, ENTRY, REVIEW, EDITING, PUBLICATION, AND DISTRIBUTION OF WEB SITE CONTENT, AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF WEBSITE CONTENT BASED ON USERS' PROFILES; INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID SOFTWARE FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 14, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 14, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 3, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance