USPTO serial 78005823
ZEROCLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3093766Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZEROCLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Letchworth, Herts, GB
Letchworth, Herts, GB
Letchworth, Herts, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, operating system programs and utilities, computer maintenance programs, programs for managing computer power supplies, word processing programs, programs accessing and manipulating databases or data files, programs for personal organization and note taking, address book programs, calculator programs, terminal emulation programs, programs for downloading and playing audio and video, programs to enhance memory and recall of facts, programs for use in transmitting data between computers and other electronic devices, programs for providing enhanced special effects while running game programs, programs for use in accessing and playing CDs, programs for use in accessing and viewing DVDs, browser programs, accessibility programs to make computers more useful for persons with disabilities; paint programs; electronic mail programs; programs for electronic conferencing; computers and parts therefor, computer peripherals, and full line of computer application programs; computers and parts therefor, computer peripherals, computer programs, and manuals therefor sold as a unit, for use in applications with graphical user interfaces; hand held computers; digital video disc (DVD) players; set-top boxes for television, radio pagers; cellular phones; blank smart cards, namely, a full line of encoded electronic chip cards containing programming for various business and technical functions; computer servers; operating system programs therefor and computer applications programs for developing computer software used in parallel processing applications; computer programs for managing communications and data exchange between computers and electronic devices; video game machines for use with televisions and computers and operating system software for use therewith; electronic game equipment, namely, equipment communicating with a television or computer for playing electronic games; operating system software for use in playing electronic games; video game player machines for use with televisions and computers; computer hardware and peripherals; computer keyboards; computer and video game joysticks and game controllers; computer game pads and controllers; computer peripherals, namely, computer mice, LCD, TFT touch screens and software to run them; computer software for playing video games and computer games; user manuals therefor sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 16, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 15, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |