USPTO serial 78006157
COMMNAV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2717541Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2003
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMMNAV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Perfect Order Software Solutions
Mechanicsburg, PA
Perfect Order Software Solutions
Mechanicsburg, PA
Perfect Order Software Solutions
Mechanicsburg, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Secure graphical user interface software that handles user attribute information for multiple classes of users while aggregating both content and application sources to a single interface presentation to the user | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perfect Order Software Solutions
- Other trademarks owned by Perfect Order Software Solutions
- Other trademarks owned by Perfect Order Software Solutions
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COMMNAV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |