Drawing for LAUNCH-NOW

USPTO serial 78007525

LAUNCH-NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAUNCH-NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanjiv D. Sarwate

SANJIV D SARWATE BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, BILLING SERVICES; PROCESSING SERVICE ORDERS AND WORK ORDERS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS, INCLUDING INTERCONNECTION WITH LOCAL FACILITIES-BASED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS; BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF USE AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS SERVICES; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS OF DATABASES CONTAINING CUSTOMER INFORMATION FOR SUBSCRIBERSACTIVE—
038CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF USE OF COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICESACTIVE—
042PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE BY OTHERS IN PROCESSING AND FULFILLING ORDERS FOR INSTALLATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND IN PROCESSING AND FULFILLING REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE USE AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance