USPTO serial 78008985
SERIOUS DNA PURIFICATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2612736Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2002
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SERIOUS DNA PURIFICATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank S. Farrell
DANIEL J POLGLAZE LEFFERT JAY & POLGLAZEPO BOX 581009MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55458-1009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical solutions for the extraction, isolation and purification of DNA and RNA samples, kits for the extraction, isolation and purification of DNA and RNA samples, consisting primarily of chemical solutions, chemical preparations in the nature of filtering materials in the genetic biotechnology industry, glass tubes for scientific purposes, photographic slide transparencies and printed instructions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 17, 2000 |
| 009 | LABORATORY AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY ROBOTIC WORKSTATIONS COMPRISING OF LABORATORY ROBOTS, COMPUTER MONITORS, COMPUTER CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, LIQUID HANDLING, MEASURING AND PUMPING APPARATUS FOR LABORATORY TESTING, AUTOMATED LIQUID HANDLING APPARATUS FOR LABORATORY TESTING, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL FOR USE IN THE PROCESS OF EXTRACTION, ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION OF DNA AND RNA SAMPLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 17, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gentra Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gentra Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gentra Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SERIOUS DNA PURIFICATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |