USPTO serial 78009940
HIKARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIKARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras, specifically 35mm single lens reflex (SLR) and medium format photographic cameras; camera bags, pouches, and tripods; camcorder bags and notebook carrying cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |