USPTO serial 78010075
INDIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Qc., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelly
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVESTE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | bottled water coolers and drinking water dispensers having electrically-actuated heating, refrigeration, and/or filtration apparatus, and parts and accessories for the aforesaid goods. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |