USPTO serial 78010220
NATURALLY PREFERRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2931494Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2005
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURALLY PREFERRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick
Richard L. Kirkpatrick PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. Box 7880Calendar/Docketing DepartmentSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soup broths, meat alternative grain-based and soy-based burgers, [ frozen processed vegetables, frozen fruits ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Baked or fried tortilla chips, ketchup, pasta, sauces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | [ Fresh fruits ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Fruit juices, organic and non-organic fruit juices ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kroger Co. of Michigan, The
- Other trademarks owned by Kroger Co. of Michigan, The
- Other trademarks owned by Kroger Co. of Michigan, The
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NATURALLY PREFERRED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |