USPTO serial 78011629
COCONUT TREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2002
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COCONUT TREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chapel Hill, NC
Chapel Hill, NC
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JiNan Glasgow
P O BOX 28539RALEIGH, NC 27611-8539UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
| 020 | furniture, namely indoor and outdoor furniture made of wood, including tables, chairs, benches, seats, sofas, and mirrors; wood carvings, namely figures, figurines, boxes, busts, and wood ornaments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
| 025 | clothing, namely shirts, T-shirts, shorts, pants, skirts, dresses, halter tops, sarongs, wraps, and scarfs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kirk, Kathryn C.
- Other trademarks owned by Kirk, Kathryn C.
- Other trademarks owned by Kirk, Kathryn C.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named COCONUT TREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |