USPTO serial 78011749
CORONA NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORONA NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. JAFFER
DAVID H JAFFER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP2550 HANOVER STPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWWARE AND HARDWARE FOR MANAGING AND CONTROLLING DATA, VOICE, AND VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK USERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, designing and implementing network systems to allow secure access to and transmission of data over a global communications network for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Campio Communications
- Other trademarks owned by CORONA NETWORKS
- Other trademarks owned by CORONA NETWORKS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CORONA NETWORKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |