USPTO serial 78012248
PUREMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUREMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry R. Lipsitz; Hoppin; McAllister
BARRY R LIPSITZ755 MAIN ST BLDG NO 8MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal clamps, including metal strain reliefs for electrical wire and cable; threaded metal clamps for electrical wire and cable; liquid tight metallic clamps including metal strain reliefs for electrical wire and cable, and metal cable glands | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical energy and power supply cables and electrical control cables; electrical connector elements for cables and wires, namely, electrical plugs, electrical jacks, male and female electrical connectors, electrical contact pins, and receptacles therefor; pre-wired electrical connectors; non-metallic electrical connectors for electrical conduit; plastic flexible and non-flexible conduit for electrical use, namely, for electrical wire and cable including plastic flexible tracking conduit for protecting electrical wire and cable, and non-metal cable glands | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | paper identification tags and printed labels not of textile for cables and wires | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metallic clamps including strain reliefs for electrical wire and cable; non-metallic threaded clamps for electrical wire and cable; liquid tight non-metallic clamps and strain reliefs for electrical wire and cable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lapp Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Lapp Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PUREMOTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |