Drawing for LES

USPTO serial 78012381

LES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH KESCHNER

MARBLE SPORTSWEAR INC9465 WILSHIRE BLVD #850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely soaps, perfumery, aromatherapy and perfume oils and hair lotionsACTIVE—
014clocks, watches and jewelryACTIVE—
016publications, namely, books and magazines concerning hobbies and collectibles and auctions relating to hobbies and collectibles; paper and stationery items, namely wrapping paper, greeting cards, write on/write off memo boards, memo pads, paper tablecloths, paper napkins, paper placemats, paper party decorations, paper postcards, stationery, playing cards, address books, personal diaries, pens, pencils, erasers, desk top organizers, desk pads, desk stands and holders for pens, desk baskets for desk accessories, desk file trays, desk top stationery cabinets, desk sets, posters, bumper stickers, calendars and decorative stickers and decalsACTIVE—
018bags and briefcases, namely diaper bags, duffels bags, backpacks and rucksacks, book bags, school bags, tote bags, satchels, shoulder bags, shopping bags, handbags, traveling bags, purses, all made of cloth, leather, suede, nubuck and reptileACTIVE—
025bathing suits, blazers, blouses, boots, bras, briefs, camisoles, caps, coats, dresses, gloves, hats, jackets, jeans, jumpsuits, leotards, neckties, nightgowns, overalls, pajamas, pants, pantyhose, raincoats, robes, sandals, shirts, shoes, shortalls, shorts, skirts, slippers, slips, socks, stockings, suits, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatshirts, T-shirts, tights tuxedos, vests and warm-up suitsACTIVE—
035retail store and online retail store services featuring clothing, cosmetics, clocks, watches, and jewelry, bags and briefcases; exchange services, namely bartering of goods for others via global computer networks; auctioneeringACTIVE—
038computer services, namely, providing an on-line bulletin board in the field of education and entertainment relating to motion picture films, interactive computer games, television shows and science fictionACTIVE—
041providing an online computer database featuring entertainment and educational information in the fields of movies, television, celebrity trivia and games; providing online information featuring movie listings, namely, all movies being shown at a specific theatre, providing theatre location where specific movies are being shown, and providing movie times, reviews and ratings, providing online information featuring celebrity events and live musical performers, namely, providing a calendar of celebrity events and live musical performances; providing online information featuring television show programming, namely, providing a listing of television shows, television show times, reviews, and channels of programming; entertainment services, namely, providing interactive websites featuring audio, visual and audiovisual educational entertainment via global computer networks and other electronic computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance