Drawing for OFFICE.NET

USPTO serial 78013678

OFFICE.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFFICE.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William O. Ferron, Jr.

WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GRP PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, operating system software; computer server software; computer network management software; computer utility programs; computer software development programs; computer security and authentication software for controlling access to and communications with computers, computer systems and wireless communication devices; computer operating software for use in operating computer peripherals, handheld computers, personal digital assistants, radio pagers, cellular phones, television and cable set-top boxes, game consoles, digital video disc (DVD) players, digital video records, radios, personal electronic devices, digital audio players, CD players and public communication kiosks; a full line of application and business software; game software for use on computers, game machines for use with televisions and video game players; browser software for computer networks, wireless networks and global communication networks; computer programs for managing communications and data and information exchange over computer networks, wireless networks and global communication networks; computers; computer peripherals; laptop computers; handheld computers; personal digital assistants; radio pagers; cellular phones; television and cable set-top boxes; video game machines for use with televisions; digital video disc (DVD) players; digital video recorders; radios; personal electronic devices, namely personal digital assistants, personal handheld electronic devices for scheduling appointments, digital audio players, CD players, wireless communication devices, cellular telephones; and public communication computer kiosksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 18, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 26, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 6, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance