USPTO serial 78014145
POWERED BY ECRIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POWERED BY ECRIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Glenn
MICHAEL A GLENN GLENN PATENT GROUP3475 EDISON WAY, STE LMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CAPTURING ELECTRONIC MESSAGES, TRANSMITTING CAPTURED ELECTRONIC MESSAGES BETWEEN ELECTRONIC DEVICES, AND EDITING, ANNOTATING, FRAMING, FORMATTING, ORGANIZING, ACCESSING, AND/OR DISPLAYING CAPTURED ELECTRONIC MESSAGES FOR USE WITH ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
| 016 | Accessories for portable digital electronic devices for capturing handwritten information and for transmitting captured handwritten information to a computing or communications device in the nature of electronically connected notepads namely, pen refills | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
| 018 | Accessories for portable digital electronic devices for capturing handwritten information and for transmitting captured handwritten information to a computing or communications device in the nature of electronically connected namely, brief-case type portfolios | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ecritek Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ecritek Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named POWERED BY ECRIO
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |