Drawing for SSL ANYWHERE

USPTO serial 78014641

SSL ANYWHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SSL ANYWHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROY S, GORDET

ROY S GORDET ROY S GORDET, ATTORNEY AT LAWSTE 601 98 BATTERY STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for enhancing, facilitating, encrypting, decrypting, processing, securing, accelerating, and managing Internet transactions, traffic, and content over local and global communication networksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 21, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 21, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 1, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2006TTBNCASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB—
Feb 27, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 17, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance