Drawing for PETSUITES

USPTO serial 78014783

PETSUITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETSUITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS W. FLYNN

THOMAS W FLYNN WOOD, HERRON & EVANS2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Pet resort services, namely, providing boarding and day care services to others' petsACTIVENov 17, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 28, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 28, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 11, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 18, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance