USPTO serial 78015070
GECKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GECKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Drangel
JENNIFER K LAWSON TESTA HURWITZ & THIBEAULT, LLP.125 HIGH ST HIGH ST TWRBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | WINDOW FRAMES, WINDOW SPRINGS AND BALANCES, SASH FASTENERS FOR WINDOWS, AND WINDOW SYSTEMS, NAMELY, WINDOWS, WINDOW FRAMES, WINDOW SPRINGS AND BALANCES, AND SASH FASTENERS FOR WINDOWS, ALL MADE OF METAL | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | WINDOW FRAMES, WINDOW SPRINGS AND BALANCES, SASH FASTENERS FOR WINDOWS, AND WINDOW SYSTEMS, NAMELY, WINDOWS, WINDOW FRAMES, WINDOW SPRINGS AND BALANCES, AND SASH FASTENERS FOR WINDOWS, ALL MADE OF NON-METALLIC MATERIALS EXCEPT GLASS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |