USPTO serial 78015124
PERFORMANCE MARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFORMANCE MARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
Dayton, OH
Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of data analysis for automobile dealerships | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Reynolds and Reynolds Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE MARK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |