USPTO serial 78015453
TXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Leonardi
ROBERT M LEONARDI DANA TECHNOLOGY INC8000 YANKEE RDOTTAWA LAKE, MI 49267UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Axles for use with on-highway vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |