USPTO serial 78015478
NEWPOWER ON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEWPOWER ON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. ROSINI
JAMES E ROSINI KENYON KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for analyzing and managing energy use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| May 19, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |