Drawing for BEAT SUITE

USPTO serial 78015495

BEAT SUITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAT SUITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Chung

ROSHAWN B BOYCE VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC1515 BROADWAY 50TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video game machines for use with television, audio output game machines for use with television, video game cartridges, video games recorded on CD-ROM for use in freestanding video game machines; and computer products, namely, game cartridges for computer video games and video output game machines and instructional materials sold as a unit, computer game cassettes, computer game tapes and manuals sold as a unit; theatrical or musical sound recordings; theatrical or musical video recordings, laser discs and digital video discs/digital versatile discs ("DVD"); sunglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 20, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 23, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance