Drawing for XPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 78015863

XPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Fisher

RANDALL S POLCYN FISHER THURBER LLP4225 EXECUTIVE SQ STE 1600LA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemically treated transfer paper used for application of chemicals to fabrics which are to be imprinted.ACTIVE—
007power operated heat transfer applicator for applying transfers to ceramic or polymer mugsACTIVE—
009Mouse pads in a variety of shapes, assorted words and graphic designs.ACTIVE—
020Novelty figurines made of plastic resinACTIVE—
021Decorative ceramic, porcelain, glass and stained glass figures, figurines, mugs, coasters, dishesACTIVE—
028Plush and stuffed toys.ACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship services in the fields of printed mugs.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 8, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance