USPTO serial 78016453
ENABLING PERVASIVE CONNECTIVITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2521435Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2001
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENABLING PERVASIVE CONNECTIVITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA CALRA, CA
SANTA CALRA, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE MCKNEW
LESLIE MCKNEW BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP1 MARKET SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; telecommunications hardware; computer network hardware; semiconductors; integrated circuits; computer software for electronics design; and computer software for transmission of audio, images, text and data | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |