Drawing for VHYPER

USPTO serial 78016726

VHYPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VHYPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009LABORATORY INSTRUMENT FOR EVALUATING THE RESISTANCE OF STERILIZATION PROCESS BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS, NAMELY, AN ASSEMBLY OF SPECIALLY DESIGNED AND FABRICATED COMPONENTS AND HARDWARE COMPRISING AN AIR DRYER, HEATER, FLOW METERING AND INJECTION NOZZLE, CHAMBER FOR EVAPORATION OF PEROXIDE VAPOR, SAMPLE HOLDING FIXTURE WITH TRANSPORT MECHANISM, EXPOSURE CHAMBER, SENSORS, TIMERS AND CONVEYANCE CONDUITS, THAT ALLOWS PRECISE CONTROL OF TEMPERATURE, MOISTURE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE CONCENTRATION FOR TESTING THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH INDICATORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 18, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 21, 2004PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 4, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 21, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2002LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Dec 17, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance