USPTO serial 78016980
PROGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEWARD R WEINGRAM
EDWARD WEINGRAM WEINGRAM & ASSOCIATESP O BOX 927MAYWOOD, NJ 07607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND OUTDOOR ACTIVITY GAMES IN THE NATURE OF BALLS, WATER BALLS, BASEBALLS, SOCCER BALLS, TENNIS BALLS, BASKETBALLS, FOOTBALLS, GOLF BALLS, RACKET BALLS, PADDLE BALLS, HOOK AND PILE BALLS, VOLLEY BALLS, SQUASH BALLS, HOCKEY PUCKS, HOCKEY STICKS, DARTS, DARTBOARDS, RING TOSS SETS, HORSESHOE TOSS SETS, PADDLEBALL SETS, RACKET BALL SETS, TENNIS RACKETS, TENNIS RACKET AND BALL SETS, BADMINTON SETS, SLING SHOT SETS, GLOVES, MITTS, BALL CATCHERS, BALL AND CATCHER SETS, MITT AND BALL SETS, FLYING DISKS, BOOMERANGS, BASEBALL SETS, TEE-BALL SETS, TOSS AND CATCH GAMES, LACROSSE SETS, GOLF CLUBS, GOLF TEES, JUMP ROPES, SCOOTERS, CRAFT ACTIVITY SETS, YO-YOS, AND COLLECTIBLE MINIATURE SKATEBOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |