USPTO serial 78017060
ULTRA-FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ULTRA-FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
WILMINGTON, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Newark, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. McDonald, Reg. No. 29,193
ROBERT E. MCDONALD1100 MIDLAND BLDG., LEGAL DEPT.101 PROSPECT AVE., N.W.CLEVELAND, OH. 441151075, OH 44115-1075Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning preparations, namely, industrial solvents and degreasing preparations not used in manufacturing processes for use in cleaning metals, electro-mechanical machinery, and electrical equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sherwin-Williams Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by SWIMC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIMC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIMC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIMC, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWIMC, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ULTRA-FORCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |