USPTO serial 78017356
WATAPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATAPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Platt
JONATHAN A PLATT RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP19TH FL1621 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, providing an online website featuring information on the products and services of various businesses, providing storage facilities for such information and allowing selective access to those storage facilities in the form of respective mailboxes identified with respective users; and disseminating between and among users, business information, information concerning products and services, information concerning employment and job availability, and information relating to retail services for clothing, electrical appliances, toiletries, recorded music, books and food; disseminating between and among users and businesses business information, information concerning products and services, information concerning employment and job availability, and information relating to retail services for clothing, electrical appliances, toiletries, recorded music, books, food; disseminating information relating to education and entertainment on topics including concerts, parties, culture, theatre, exhibitions, sports, movies, videos and news, jokes and gossip; and disseminating information relating to restaurants, coffee shops, pubs, clubs, discos, accommodation,Internet websites and WAP sites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |