Drawing for GHOSTBALL

USPTO serial 78017440

GHOSTBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GHOSTBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary Schnittgrund

Gary Schnittgrund Law Offices of Gary Schnittgrund28235 Newhall Ranch Rd, #105Valencia, CA 91355UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Baseball tabletop boardgameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Nov 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2005EX4MSOU EXTENSION 4 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Nov 21, 2005EX4DSOU EXTENSION 4 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Oct 27, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 19, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2002IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance