USPTO serial 78017580
SPRINT LUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPRINT LUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M Furr
253 N MAIN STJOHNSTOWN, OH 43031UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |