Drawing for THE LARGEST CO-BRAND IN THE WORLD

USPTO serial 78017910

THE LARGEST CO-BRAND IN THE WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE LARGEST CO-BRAND IN THE WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane M. Reed

DIANE M REED KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network and wireless communications devicesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, physical geographic and electronic navigation and index services available via global computer networks and wireless computer communication devices, namely, providing and maintaining a database of alpha-numeric physical geographic and electronic location identifiers for searching, retrieving, categorizing and obtaining web site information, information on physical geographic locations, and other information on a global computer network; creating indexes of information, web sites, physical geographic locations, and other information resources available on computer networks; providing information on a global computer network related to locations of web sites and home pages and related to physical geographic locations; providing maps on a global computer network; and providing general information over a global computer network in the fields of news, weather, current events, geography, maps and reference materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance