USPTO serial 78018097
EML TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2813993Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EML TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAIPEI, TW
Danville, CA
Danville, CA
Danville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elliot B. Aronson
5001 Harbord Dr.OAKLAND, CA 94618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | motion-activated outdoor electric lighting fixtures and motion-activated electric floodlights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 7, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POLLUX LIGHTING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EML Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EML Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EML Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named EML TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |