USPTO serial 78018536
KNOCKOUT SPORTSWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2824890Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KNOCKOUT SPORTSWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tauranga, NZ
Tauranga, NZ
Tauranga, NZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR, HEAD WEAR, TEAM UNIFORMS, CORPORATE UNIFORMS, PLAYING JERSEYS, PLAYING SHORTS, PLAYING SKIRTS, PANTS, TRACK SUITS, WARM UP SUITS, CASUAL CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHORTS, TEE SHIRTS SWEAT SUITS, KNITWEAR, NAMELY, KNIT SHIRTS, KNIT SHORTS, KNIT JACKETS, KNIT PANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 7, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS FAMILY TRUST, A NEW ZEALAND TRUST, THE TRUSTEES COMPRISING ARNOLD ROGER THOMAS, PAMELA JUDITHTHOMAS AND ROBERT MILLIGAN SCOTT
- Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS FAMILY TRUST, A NEW ZEALAND TRUST, THE TRUSTEES COMPRISING ARNOLD ROGER THOMAS, PAMELA JUDITHTHOMAS AND ROBERT MILLIGAN SCOTT
- Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS FAMILY TRUST, A NEW ZEALAND TRUST, THE TRUSTEES COMPRISING ARNOLD ROGER THOMAS, PAMELA JUDITHTHOMAS AND ROBERT MILLIGAN SCOTT
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KNOCKOUT SPORTSWEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |