USPTO serial 78018644
MICROFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANET KAISER CASTANEDA
1049 KIEL COURTSUNNYVALE, CA 94089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | FIBER OPTIC DELIVERY SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF CONDUITS FOR DELIVERING LASER ENERGY FOR PERFORMING SURGICAL, PERCUTANEOUS MINIMALLY INVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |