USPTO serial 78019154
TECH TORQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECH TORQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter N. Lalos
STEVEN, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON DC, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Actuators for valves, pneumatic actuators, and parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |