Drawing for H HYPER CORP

USPTO serial 78019519

H HYPER CORP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2908145Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 7, 2004
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with H HYPER CORP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SERVICESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 13, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 8, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 8, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance