Drawing for ISHIP.STORE

USPTO serial 78019750

ISHIP.STORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISHIP.STORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Schaetzel

Stephen M. Schaetzel King & Spalding LLP1180 Peachtree StreetAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation services relating to ordering, mailing, shipping, receipt logs, inventory and tracking of merchandise and orders, and providing business consultation services relating to the setup, integration, customization, training and support of shipping preparation, processing, management and tracking services; information management services, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking documents, packages and freight over computer networks, intranets and internets; preparing business reports relating to shipping activity; promoting the goods and services of others through on-line ordering and cataloging of those goods and servicesACTIVE—
039Providing transportation information, namely, providing freight shipping rates and shipping quotes via a global information networkACTIVE—
040Printing services relating to carrier and address labels and postageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jan 24, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 7, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 6, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance