Drawing for ISHIP.INC

USPTO serial 78020327

ISHIP.INC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISHIP.INC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLARK W LACKERT

CLARK W LACKERT KING AND SPALDING1185 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 35NEW YORK, NY 10036-2686UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing business services, namely services for preparing, processing, managing, and tracking of shipping activities using multiple third-party carriers, preparing and analyzing data and preparing reports of shipping activity, comparing shipping rates and obtaining shipping quotes from multiple third-party carriers, facilitating ordering, mailing, shipping, receipt logs, inventory and tracking of merchandise and orders, facilitating the exchange of information between merchants, businesses consumers and others pertaining to ordering, mailing, shipping, receipt logs, inventory and tracking of merchandise and orders, and providing consulting services for setup, integration, customization, training and support of shipping preparation, processing, management and tracking servicesACTIVE—
040Printing of carrier and address labels and postageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Aug 31, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance