Drawing for WORKSPHERE WISDOM

USPTO serial 78020492

WORKSPHERE WISDOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKSPHERE WISDOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas L. Bohan

Patricia M. Mathers Bohan Mathers & Associates, LLCP.O. Box 17707Portland, ME 04112-8707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE HAVING THE FUNCTIONS OF CONNECTIVITY TO AND INTERACTION WITH INFORMATION RESOURCES AND DATA SOURCES, AND OF COLLECTION, MANAGEMENT, PROCESSING, STORAGE, AND ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION AND DATA FOR USE BY INDIVIDUALS AND ENTERPRISES IN SELF-DIRECTED AND GUIDED SKILLS DEVELOPMENT, CAREER TRANSITION, CAREER PLANNING, AND CAREER MANAGEMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 26, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 17, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 10, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 5, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 30, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance