Drawing for TIC

USPTO serial 78020855

TIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN KORN

MARTIN KORN LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036PARTS REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PARTS TO OTHERS IN EXCHANGE FOR RETURNED PARTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 5, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 16, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 24, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance