USPTO serial 78020871
WEB QUARTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEB QUARTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Spiegel
PAUL A SPIEGEL LAW OFFICE OF PAUL A SPIEGEL1343 SACRAMENTO ST STE 2SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely providing electronic communication via computer networks in the nature of e-mail, Internet, facsimile and telephone communication services, electronic transmission of data, images, messages and documents via computer terminals; electronic text-to-voice messaging services; electronic mail services; electronic store-and-forward messaging; providing on-line chat rooms for the transmission of messages among computer user concerning a variety of topics of general interest; consulting services in the field of electronic group messaging for others desiring to provide electronic group messaging services | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |