USPTO serial 78021318
OUTNABOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUTNABOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Protective fabric cover for use with baby carriers worn on the body | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |