USPTO serial 78021585
NAPLES POLO CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2783417Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2003
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NAPLES POLO CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L WHITELAW JENNIFER L WHITELAW3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL NTHIRD FLNAPLES, FL 34103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF GOLF, TENNIS, SOCCER, POLO AND EQUESTRIAN TOURNAMENTS; CONDUCTING ENTERTAINMENT EXHIBITIONS IN THE NATURE OF ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS; ORGANIZING EXHIBITIONS FOR SPORTING PURPOSES; ORGANIZING COMMUNITY SPORTING EVENTS; HOSPITALITY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY MANAGING GROUP TRIPS TO SPORTING EVENTS AND PROCURING EVENT TICKETS; HOSPITALITY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY ARRANGING TICKET RESERVATIONS FOR SPORTING EVENTS; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT ALL OF THE FOREGOING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER WEBSITE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2002 |
| 042 | RESTAURANT AND BAR SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HOSPITALITY; HOSPITALITY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY MAKING RESERVATIONS AND PROVIDING TEMPORARY LODGING FOR ATHLETES; HOSPITALITY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY ARRANGING A HOSPITALITY AREA WITH FOOD AND BEVERAGES AT SPORTING EVENTS; HOSPITALITY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY PROCURING LODGING AND MEALS; AND PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT ALL OF THE FOREGOING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |