USPTO serial 78022395
GIDGET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3197189Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GIDGET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MULTI-MEDIA TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, LTD.
LAGUNA BEACH, CA
Other trademarks owned by MULTI-MEDIA TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, LTD.
Huntington Beach, CA
Cardiff, CA
Cardiff, CA
Cardiff, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY LIP BALM, LIP STICK; TANNING AGENTS, NAMELY TANNING OIL, TANNING GEL, TANNING CREAM; SOAP, NAMELY, SKIN SOAP, BATH SOAP; BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY BATH POWDER, BATH OILS, BUBBLE BATH; PERFUME AND ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; HAIR PRODUCTS, NAMELY HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 2002 |
| 012 | VEHICLES, NAMELY, BICYCLES, TRICYCLES, PULL WAGONS, AND BABY STROLLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2004 |
| 014 | JEWELRY, WATCHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2005 |
| 016 | STATIONERY, ENVELOPES, GREETING CARDS, COLORING BOOKS, SONG BOOKS, COMIC BOOKS, ADDRESS BOOKS, SHORT STORY BOOKS, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF SURFING, SKATEBOARDING, SWIMMING, AND TOPICS OF INTEREST TO YOUNG WOMEN, POP-UP BOOKS, DIARIES, BOOK MARKS, CARDBOARD GIFT BOXES, PLASTIC GIFT WRAP, PAINTING SETS, PAPER NAPKINS, TOILET PAPER, DISPOSABLE DIAPERS, NEWS LETTERS AND MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF SURF MOVIES, SURFING, SKATEBOARDING AND TOPICS OF INTEREST TO YOUNG WOMEN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2004 |
| 024 | PILLOW CASES, BED SHEETS, COMFORTERS, CLOTH TABLE COVERS, BATH TOWELS, HAND TOWELS, WASH CLOTHS, CLOTH BATH MATS, AND SHOWER CURTAINS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MULTI-MEDIA TECHNOLOGY VENTURES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GIDGET MARKS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DoBransky, Michael T.
- Other trademarks owned by DoBransky, Michael T.
- Other trademarks owned by DoBransky, Michael T.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named GIDGET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |