Drawing for INSIDE DESIGN

USPTO serial 78022966

INSIDE DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INSIDE DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

THILO C AGTHE WALTER, CONSTON, ALEXANDER & GREEN, PC90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1387UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES AND TALENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR DESIGNERS IN THE FIELDS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN, PRODUCT DESIGN, OBJECT STYLE AND GRAPHIC ARTS DESIGNACTIVENov 30, 1998
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELDS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN, PRODUCT DESIGN, OBJECT STYLE AND GRAPHIC ARTS DESIGN; AND PROVIDING A WEB SITE OF INFORMATION ON ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN, PRODUCT DESIGN, OBJECT STYLE AND GRAPHIC ARTS DESIGNACTIVEJan 31, 1996
042PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN, PRODUCT DESIGN, OBJECT STYLE AND GRAPHIC ARTS DESIGN AND TESTING FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHITECTURAL AND INTERIOR DESIGN, PRODUCT DESIGN, OBJECT STYLE AND GRAPHIC ARTS DESIGN CONSULTATION FOR OTHERS IN THE ADOPTION OF CORPORATE TRADEMARKS AND IDENTITIES, AND BRANDING OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; PACKAGING OBJECT STYLE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, AND CUSTOM WRITING SERVICES FOR OTHERSACTIVEJan 31, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2002GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance