Drawing for CLEAR LIGHT INDEX

USPTO serial 78023027

CLEAR LIGHT INDEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR LIGHT INDEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel T. Beres

JOEL T BERES STITES & HARBISONSTE 1800400 W MARKET STLOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3352

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ophthalmic lensesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 10, 2002RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Aug 9, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 3, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance